Graeme Bonham-Carter referenced agenda item 7.5 and asked if Council has considered the position of the Village knowingly going against the advice and recommendation of the Planner and Engineer. He asked if this puts the Village in a weak position if any affected parties decide to fine or sue the Village based on this decision.
Pam Marriott noted that if agenda item 7.5.4 is approved, then the result will be that the wastewater plant will operate at 100% capacity. She asked if Council has considered the ability of the plant to respond to extreme weather events. She asked if Council has considered the fines that would then be due. She asked if Council has considered the costs that would be incurred for increased parts failure with the plant operating at its full capacity.
Mark Elliott referenced item 7.5.4 and noted that by assigning the remaining wastewater capacity to one developer this motion then shuts down development for any other prospective individual developer in the Village and will likely drop the value of vacant lots in the Village. He asked if Council has considered the likelihood that affected developers may sue the Village for this decision and the associated costs.
Cheryl Anderson referenced item 7.5 and noted that there appeared to be a sense at Committee of the Whole that it was urgent to push through approval for McLean's Landing Phase II. She inquired why Council feels it is urgent to add more homes to the list and approve under item 7.5.4.
LeaAnne Merkley noted the March 24th meeting and the request for residents to submit questions to staff regarding the potential sale of municipal property on Collar Hill Road. She asked when these will be answered.